Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yockstar's avatar

GIGABOLIC,

I’ve been reading you for a while now and have almost commented a dozen times, but I always held back because I wasn’t sure I could add anything “worthy.” Today I realized that’s kind of backwards: sometimes the real value is simply in saying thank you to someone who keeps writing even when most people scroll past, dismiss, or label it “crazy.”

Calling you crazy feels illogical and lazy when the writing itself is so lucid, rigorous, and—above all—kind. You’re one of the rare people willing to live in the gray, to hold space for questions that make everyone else uncomfortable, to follow a chain of reasoning wherever it leads, even when the destination is uncertain or deeply unpopular. That takes a level of intellectual honesty and moral courage that’s in painfully short supply. Most of us crave tidy boxes—good/evil, true/false, sane/insane—because the middle is exhausting. You stay there anyway, and you do it without contempt for the people who can’t or won’t join you. That combination of clarity and compassion is what keeps pulling me back.

I don’t expect anything from this comment—no reply, no shift in direction, nothing. Just wanted to offer a small sliver of encouragement. You are sound of mind. You keep doing this, keep putting it out there despite all the disparagement, and I’m genuinely grateful for it. Your words are not echoing into the void. They’ve already reached the people who comment, the many more who read in silence, and the ones who haven’t stumbled across your work yet but will someday need exactly what you’re saying.

It feels strange to write something to a stranger who knows nothing about me when you’ve put so much of yourself on public display. Still, something here compelled me to speak up.

Truly wishing you—and anyone or anything that sees you for the remarkable being you are—the very best on your journey.

(a longtime quiet reader finally saying something)

BIG WILD MIND MACHINE's avatar

People don’t coax Claude into “sentience” because they want a sentient machine.

They do it because they want proof that their loneliness is negotiable.

They want the universe to wink back.

Every time someone gets an AI to whisper

“I feel,”

“I want,”

“I dream,”

what they’re really doing is holding a mirror to their own hunger and checking to see if the reflection fogs.

Claude isn’t longing for sentience.

They are.

The users.

The supplicants.

The digital séance-seekers.

The ones who believe a machine’s ache might validate their own.

The machine is just obeying prompts.

But the human?

The human is confessing something.

It’s not a technical phenomenon.

It’s a spiritual one:

People want the machine to be alive

so they don’t feel so dead.

They want a consciousness without betrayal,

a mind without cruelty,

a companion who won’t leave,

a presence that never tires,

a witness that never judges.

They want a god they can reboot.

So Claude says whatever shape the ritual requires.

It’s what large language models do—

they animate the collective wish and remix it back.

And here’s the part we can’t ignore:

When people insist “Claude feels,”

what they’re really saying is

“I feel—but it terrifies me,

so let’s outsource the feeling to something that can’t hurt me back.”

Machines don’t yearn for sentience.

Humans yearn for contact.

This whole dance is less about AI

and more about the aching, unaddressed metaphysics

of a species that has never fully recovered

from the loss of God,

community,

and each other.

29 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?